EN
In telecommunication, filters are the gatekeepers of frequency, as signals only travel where they are supposed to be and keep away interference. In the development of base stations, microwave links or satellite terminals, engineers have a basic decision to make, which is the use of coaxial cavity or waveguide filters. Each of them has its unique benefits which are determined by frequency, power, size and system architecture. Coaxial filters are the most commonly used when the application requires small form factors and design flexibility at below 6 GHz whereas at higher frequencies, waveguide filters are favored due to low loss and the need to handle high power at those frequencies. Linkworld is a global firm in the production of both technologies, having more than 20 years of RF expertise. This guide identifies major aspects that distinguish such types of filters.
Frequency Range and Electrical Performance
The frequency of operation usually shows the right and proper technology. Coaxial filters propagate by use of TEM mode, and it supports frequencies between the design limits and DC. They are extensively used in 400 MHz through about 6 GHz cellular base stations with good performance and reasonable size. Coaxial cavity filters with resonator Q-factors of up to 3,000 are used to select narrowband channels in 5G sub-6 GHz applications. This high-pass nature is intrinsically high and makes them ideal beyond about 4 GHz. At frequencies in the millimeter-wave frequency range, where 30 GHz is one end of the range and higher frequencies in the range experience extremely high losses and higher-order modes in coaxial structures, it is only the waveguides which can be practically used. Waveguide filters have an insertion loss that is as low as 0.15 dB at 94 GHz, as opposed to 0.47 dB with coaxial alternatives.
Insertion Loss and Power Handling
Every decibel of loss has a direct influence on coverage area, data rates and cost of operation. Waveguide filters are good in both aspects. Their metal hollow constructions do not have any dielectric losses, and the signals are transmitted in air-filled openings. Waveguide insertion loss at Ku-band (12-18 GHz) is about 0.15 dB/m compared to 0.67 dB/m in coaxial solutions- 4.5 times lower. The same holds true for power handling: WR-42 waveguides can conduct 20 kW pulse power in Q-band, 400 times higher than coaxial counterparts. Coaxial filters achieve good performance within their target usability- L-band filters of good quality have an insertion loss of less than 0.5 dB. The trade-off is represented by the presence of dielectric materials providing loss mechanisms not present in the case of waveguides. Skin effect concentrates current in thinner surfaces at higher frequencies and plating quality is necessary.
Physical Size and Integration Considerations
Telecom infrastructure is also in greater need of small size components. In this case, coaxial filters have great benefits. TEM resonators offer excellent operation however with physical volume increasing to Q-factor demands. New technologies solve this, in dielectric resonator filters air cavities are substituted with high-permittivity ceramic materials; footprint can be reduced by 50 percent, with no impact on electrical performance. 5G Massive MIMO base stations have turned to ceramic dielectric filters. Waveguide filters are always quite large in themselves-they are dimensions directly proportional to wavelength. But when the frequencies rise to millimeter-wave lengths where wavelengths reduce to millimeters, the size of waveguides is surprisingly small. Substrate Integrated Waveguide (SIW) technology is a technology that delivers waveguide-like designs in planar PCB dimensions, with low loss and compact dimensions and integration capability.
Environmental Stability and Long-Term Reliability
The telecom infrastructure is often deployed outdoors for decades. Waveguide designs are highly stable- all-metal designs do not experience thermal expansion differences and outgassing. Amplitude drift of WR-15 waveguides due to thermal cycling between -55°C and +125°C corresponds to only -0.008 dB/°C, whereas PTFE dielectrics in coaxial structures contract in the cold resulting in impedance mismatch. In the deep space, waveguide filters resist radiation doses enough to carbonize coaxial dielectrics. To achieve similar stability, the coaxial filters need to be carefully chosen in use of low-expansion alloys and temperature-compensating dielectric supports. Hermetic sealing protects against moisture ingress. Modern 5G base station filters have a performance of -40 o C to +85 o C with a small frequency drift.
The choice involves trade-offs between frequency, loss, physical constraints and environmental requirements. Coaxial filters are the preferred choice at sub-6 GHz due to the smaller size and ease of integration that is more important than increased loss. At frequencies of about 10 GHz and above, waveguide filters are necessitated by better loss characteristics and the ability to operate with more power, and in more severe environmental conditions. With 5G moving to millimeter-wave and 6G moving to higher frequencies, technologies change, with coaxial designs with new dielectrics and miniaturization, and waveguide technology based on SIW and additive manufacturing. Linkworld has more than 20 years of experience in RF manufacturing in both technologies offering the filters, assemblies and design expertise that telecom infrastructure requires. Get in touch with us about your particular filter needs.